Archive for October, 2006

More pictures of our new family member

Thursday, October 26th, 2006

I’m going to continue a bit with my new-dad behavior and post a few more pictures of Catherine.

[Cate and Rick]
Proud dad moment: Catherine and Rick.

Catherine’s probably thinking “Hmm – did I inherit his hair or mom’s?”

[Cate, Patty, and Patty's dad]
Three generations: Catherine, Patty, and Patty’s dad.

I bet Catherine’s wondering when someone’s going to come by with lunch!

[Cate and her grandpas]
Proud grandpas: Catherine being held by Rick’s dad (top) and Patty’s dad (bottom).

You might notice that there’s a scrap of quilt showing in the top picture. That’s a signature quilt, signed by members of our families. Since Catherine can’t (yet) sign the quilt, we had to make do by letting her “sign” the quilt with her feet!

In the bottom picture, Catherine demonstrates the newborn baby’s “grab your finger and rip it off” reflex.

Edited to add:

Here are some pictures of the grandmothers with Catherine. I’d have added them earlier, but they were still on the camera!

[Three generations]
Three gernerations, part 2: Catherine with Patty’s mom and Patty.

[Catherine with Rick's mom]
Another new grandma: Catherine with Rick’s mom

A new addition!

Tuesday, October 24th, 2006

We have a new addition to the Shrimp and Grits family!

[Newbord Catherine Ella]

Meet Catherine, born at 3:09 PM on October 23, 2006.

She weighs in at 7 lb, 9 oz and is currently 20.5 inches long. And she has quite the set of lungs!

Edited to add: Want to see more? Take a look at even more pictures

A new way to get your degree!

Sunday, October 22nd, 2006

Here’s a new way to get your degree.

[Vending machine]

So, how many quarters do I need for a doctorate?

I’m no marketing wizard. But I do think that, just perhaps, this might be the wrong message to send to students!

Revisiting the language problem

Thursday, October 19th, 2006

An old blog post of mine looked at an apparently minor issue that comes up from time to time in science education: the problem of language. I asked students to simply tell me – before I went over this sort of thing in class – what they thought scientists meant when they use the word “theory”.

[What?  I don't understand. (From Star Ocean: The Second Story for the PSX by Tri-Ace/Enix)]

Here are the results of the same question asked to a group of students in 2006.

  1. Theory: is what you think the outcome will be. Theory: Guessing on what you think will happen in a situation.
  2. Theory is an idea that has not been proven.
  3. The best educated answer or solution.
  4. It’s something that you will use during the experiment to help you get the results of the experiment.
  5. The closest knowledge as you can get on the subject you are working on.
  6. Theory – an explanation that is not proven yet.
  7. Any scientific experiment that has not been proven.
  8. A theory is what you believe will happen.
  9. Theory – scientific study of how something works using a formula.
  10. A theory is formed when you have a hypothesis that has been tested and retested.
  11. Something happening over time.
  12. Theory is a belief. It is not a proven fact.
  13. A theory is an idea of what may be going on.
  14. A theory is something thought to be true without scientific proof.
  15. The definition of the term theory is science is your judgement of experiments.
  16. Theory – is an assumption of how something works.
  17. Theory is used as an idea in an experiment, that has not yet been proven as fact.
  18. You have to test things to prove a theory.
  19. The definition of theory is something we think is going to happen.
  20. A theory is a speculation about the result of experiments or laws prior to conclusive test evidence.
  21. Beliefs tested as the cause and effect of an experiment.
  22. The meaning behind things. Why things react and work the way they do.
  23. A theory is a supposition that is backed up with evidence or experimental support as opposed to a hypothesis which has not as much experimental support but is an educated guess.
  24. A theory is a belief of something like "The Creation Theory" or "The Big Bang Theory" of how the earth came to being. A theory hasn’t been proven, it’s a explanation that makes sense unless proven otherwise.

While there are glimmers of understanding in there, I’ll still have to conclude that your average person just doesn’t know what science is about. You can certainly see the signs of religious anti-science indoctrination, too. (Look at the bolded answers.)

Same as it ever was?

Bowling a 118 (with atoms)

Tuesday, October 17th, 2006

Nuclear chemistry really isn’t my specialty, but how can I not be iinterested in the news that scientists have produced a new element? It’s element 118.

Scientists said they smashed together calcium with the manmade element californium to make an atom with 118 protons in its nucleus.

The new element would be one of the noble (inert) gases – so it wouldn’t be all that interesting to play with in our introductory chemistry laboratories.

[Element 118]

You wouldn’t want to play with element 118, anyway. Like most of the heavier elements, element 118 is extremely unstable.

The new element lasted for just one millisecond, […]

… so don’t go looking for it at your local chemical supplier anytime soon!

But wait a second … doesn’t the story of the discovery of element 118 sound just a bit familiar? Sure does!

At a meeting of LBNL employees in June of this year, director Charles Shank announced that the laboratory had recently disciplined one of the members of the team for “scientific misconduct.” A yearlong internal investigation had convinced the laboratory’s directorate that the evidence for the creation of element 118 and its decay sequence through element 116 in the 1999 experiment had, in fact, been surreptitiously fabricated by one of the experimenters.

(emphasis mine)

I can only hope that – this time – someone has very carefully checked over the data. Otherwise, we will have to name this as-yet-unnamed new element “unobtainium”.

On the positive side, the scandal over the original “discovery” of element 118 does illustrate, yet again, the self-correcting nature of science. A reseracher was able to fool people with suspect data for a time, but it was only a short time.

Friday cat: Do not disturb my slumber

Friday, October 13th, 2006

What better way to celebrate Friday the 13th than with our black cat?

Tom has taken to sleeping on the small couch out on the sun porch.


Tom: Have you opened another can of Fancy Feast? If not, then do not disturb my slumber.

Old Europe Mediterranean Grill

Thursday, October 12th, 2006

Although Myrtle Beach has lots of restaurants, you might find yourself getting hungry before you get there. Why? If you’re going to the beach during the summer, traffic’s going to be backed up for miles. If you’re in that situation, you might be forced to stop off in Florence, SC for a bite to eat. Let me recommend that you avoid the plastic food substitute served at places like Ruby Tuesday and try one of the real local restaurants.

[Sign]

Old Europe Mediterranean Grill is a former pizza joint (Pizza Chef, or Pizza Inn or something like that) that has been granted a new life – as a place with good food and excellent service.

[Tables]
While the decor doesn’t quite match the spectacle of some of Myrtle Beach’s expensive places, the food more than holds its own.

If you do prefer some flash with your dinner, visit Old Europe on Thursday or Saturday evenings – when they have live bellydancing. (You’ll have to go yourself to see that, since I don’t have a picture of the bellydancer!)

The menu at Old Europe is quite varied, and I haven’t had the opportunity to try even half of the stuff they offer – despite eating there at least once a week. I keep coming back to the gyros, served with Greek potatoes.

[We need another gyro!]
I pulled this one apart a bit before taking the picture.

You can order several kinds of bread with your meal. One of our favorites is the Damascus bread – which is dough baked in Old Europe’s brick oven and served with oil for dipping.

[Old Europe]
Here, Patty voraciously devours the Damascus bread as I try to take a picture

Some of our other favorites on the menu are the cheese ravioli, the lasagna, and the brick-oven pizza – which I’ll eventually get some pictures of.

The prices are quite reasonable. Our bill usually runs about twenty dollars or so for two people including tip and an order of bread.

If you’re in Florence and you’d like to try Old Europe out, you can find it at 944 S Irby Street in Florence, next to the Julia theater.

Pet peeves: Preforming an analysis

Monday, October 9th, 2006

Here’s one of my pet peeves – “preformed”. I routinely have students tell me things like

The standardization of 0.1 M base was preformed using the primary standard grade KHP.

I’m sure the student didn’t mold the base into a predeterimined shape before doing the analysis. Perhaps this student meant that they “performed” the standardization?

Of course, even the word “perform” in a description of what you’re doing in a lab is never actually necessary – unless you’re actually performing your experiment before a live studio audience. What’s wrong with saying sometihng like this?

The 0.1M NaOH solution was standardized by titrating against primary standard grade KHP.

Down to their level

Monday, October 9th, 2006

It’s always interesting to know what your students are actually thinking. I have to admit, though, that sometimes I would really rather not know. Take this example, buried in the comments from a set of student surveys from a past semester:

[Rick] needs to come down to our level.

You might expect to hear comments like this from students in, say, sophomore level chemical engineering thermodynamics. Heck, I still have nightmares about that course. The comment above, though, was left for me by one of my introductory chemistry students. Introductory chemistry is the lowest-level chemistry course we offer – roughly on par with a high school course. It’s the lowest-level science course with a lab that we teach.

How low a level are we talking here? Here’s one of the questions from this course’s first test.

Determine the length of the line based on the ruler drawn below.
[image of a ruler and a line]

(Why ask about a ruler in an intro chemistry class? We discuss reading of measuring devices like rulers, graduated cylinders, and balances early on in the course – otherwise the students couldn’t really do much in the course’s lab. The ruler itself is mostly meant to connect a familiar measurement – what adult has never used a ruler? – to more unfamiliar devices like graduated cylinders and balances.)

I’m at a loss. Education isn’t like the limbo. It’s not about how low you can go. And, with this particular course, it’s not as if I can “come down” any more. At some point, the student has got to climb.

Classics of Student Literature

Friday, October 6th, 2006

This is a collection of funny student answers from my first few years of teaching introductory chemistry classes at my college. All student answers are presented as the student submitted them to me – spelling and all. Enjoy!

It helps to know what science you’re in

Question: Briefly define chemistry.

Student answer: A systemic substanse study of matter.

Conservation of mass: When you do a chemical reaction, the total amount of mass remains constant.

Question: Briefly state the law of conservation of mass.

Student answers:

  • Mass is equal to volume. You mass something when in something. The weight how much holds or is.
  • Mass measurements can be precise or accurate. Precise ask how close are measurements to the same measurement and accuracy wants to know is it right, law wants to know can I do it again.
  • Mass is how much it takes up on an object.
  • Mass is the kilograms.

Fun with Marshmallow Peeps!

Picture a marshmallow peep floating in a beaker of water. This was sitting in front of the students when they answered the following question.

Question: Is the marshmallow peep more or less dense than water?

Student answer: No.

Fun with magnesium!

Magnesium metal burns in air with a brilliant (almost blinding) white flame and leaves a white ash behind.

Question: Describe as thoroughly as you can what happens when a piece of magnesium is burned in air.

Student answers:

  • When a piece of magnesium burn in the air it will not show a reaction b/c the air has less density and it will not burn throughly.
  • It would explore like firecrackers.
  • When a piece of magnesium burns, it gets hard and turns into a metal.

Fun with oxygen!

Students prepare molecular oxygen (O2) and investigate the effects of a pure oxygen environment on combustion. They observe that things burn more intensely in pure oxygen.

Question: How does the amount of oxygen present affect the rate of combustion?

Student answers:

  • In high oxygen things give off better reaction and combustion. Compared to low concentration of oxygen.
  • In high concentration of oxygen is faster than air.
  • Oxygen burns faster and in air it doesn’t burn.
  • The fire is more contense in oxygen. The oxygen speeds it up (fire, the burning).

Sulfur burns a with bright blue flame in a high concentration of oxygen and with a dimmer blue flame in air. The faster sulfur burns, the brighter the flame is.

Question: What evidence from the burning of sulfur confirmed your conclusion about the rate of combustion?

Student answers:

  • That the sulfur when heat was added to it. It just started crackling and burning and looked like kinda like a copper color.
  • It change from a powder form to a liquid form.
  • It turned dark and there was a liquid.
  • An environment with pure oxygen can reignite flame from embers, but low concentration can not. High oxygen content created more intense heat.

Fun with hydrogen!

Students prepare, collect, and burn hydrogen. Hydrogen burns rapidly with a loud popping sound.

Students collected hydrogen by bubbling it through a bottle of water. This works because hydrogen does not mix well with water (it’s “insoluble”) and is able to push the water out of the bottle.

Question: What physical property of hydrogen, other than it is less dense than water, allows it to be collected in this manner?

Student answers:

  • Oxygen.
  • Very reactive.
  • Because it’s lighter than air.
  • Its ability to mix with other gases “diffusion”
  • It’s a molecule found in air.
  • It is an element, reactive, and can burn and also a gas at room temperature.

You don’t get a “pop” from hydrogen combustion when you bring a burning splint over a bottle which has sat open for a full minute. The hydrogen is very light and escapes into the room.

Question: How do you account for this?

Student answers:

  • Because hydrogen is dense.
  • B/C it was left open for 1 minute + the hydrogen left out. Was oxygen.
  • Air and hydrogen in the bottle did not make a popping noise.
  • The hydrogen was at the top of the bottom.
  • Oxygen put out the flame.