Posts Tagged ‘Politics’

Palin on climate change

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

Here’s what VP candidate Palin had to say on climate change during the VP debate:

Yes. Well, as the nation’s only Arctic state and being the
governor of that state, Alaska feels and sees impacts of climate change
more so than any other state. And we know that it’s real.

I’m not one to attribute every man — activity of man to the changes in
the climate. There is something to be said also for man’s activities,
but also for the cyclical temperature changes on our planet.

But there are real changes going on in our climate. And I don’t want to
argue about the causes. What I want to argue about is, how are we going
to get there to positively affect the impacts?

We have got to clean up this planet. We have got to encourage other
nations also to come along with us with the impacts of climate change,
what we can do about that.

Someone in the McCain campaign must’ve told her to tone down her opinions on climate change from outright denial to mere incoherence.  Earlier, she was more forceful with her denial.

“I’m not one though who would attribute it to being man-made.”

One question I’d have for Palin is this:  If you don’t believe that human activity has anything to do with climate change, then what do you expect humans to do about climate change?

If human activity isn’t responsible for climate change, what will she ask other nations to “come along with us” and do?

And as an aside, it seems that we have already had a chance to team up with other nations on the environment.  We didn’t do so well.  (I don’t recall Palin supporting that initiative, either.)

Palin/Biden liveblogging

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008

9:10 Palin says that Obama votes with his party most of the time, and that doesn’t represent change.  Haven’t the Republicans been in power until very recently?  And don’t they still hold the presidency?

9:12 So far, Biden attacks McCain and hasn’t had much of anything to say about Palin.  He gets in a good hit on McCain on his “let’s do for health care what we did for banking” remark.

9:13:  Palin “Darn right”.  Take one drink every time she says this during the debate, and you’ll never make it to the end.  She also brings up Obama “increasing taxes on people making $42000 per year”, which is false.

9:14 Biden fires back at Palin about deregulation, says that McCain voted to raise taxes more than Obama by Palin’s standard.

9:16 Biden says 95% of taxpayers get a tax break under Obama, while McCain’s tax plan benefits the rich.

9:17 Palin:  She’s always been in the “middle class”.  $500K custom-built lakehouse?  Private plane?  Riiight.  Palin misfires, I think, on health care.  It’s the private sector that’s in the doghouse right now.  I’m guessing lots of folks out there wouldn’t mind universal healthcare right about now.

9:20  Biden: 95% of small businesses wouldn’t see a tax increase.  Also points out that McCain will tax health benefits.  Good.  He also points out that people will lose insurance and the tax credit won’t be enough to replace it.  He calls McCain’s health plan a “bridge to nowhere”. Zing!

9:22  Palin:  McCain doesn’t tell one thing to one group and another thing to another group.  Riight.  She also says she “took on” the oil companies.  Doesn’t explicitly say she taxes the oil companies, though.  Palin says that the doesn’t have to cut back on any promises due to the bailout because she hasn’t been on the national scene long enough to make any promises.  What the heck?

9:25 Biden points out that Alaska does have a windfall profits tax – like the one Obama supports and McCain doesn’t.  Biden says Palin should convince McCain to do likewise.

9:27 Does Palin know about any financial institutions other than Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

9:28 Bankruptcy bill.  Good of Biden to stay away from that topic, since he’s on the wrong side of it.

9:29 Palin seems to think she’s an expert on energy independence.  By saying that it’s something we should do.  Hmm.  Oddly, she seems to never mention alternative energies to oil.

9:31  Palin on climate change.  Admits it’s real, still waffles on it being man-made.  Biden states that it’s man-made.  Points out how much energy we use, and accuses McCain of voting against alternative energy (20 times).  Finally, someone mentions alternative energy.

9:34  Palin:  “Drill, baby, drill” for “hungry markets”.  Says offshore drilling is clean and safe.

9:36 Biden: Supports “rights for same-sex couples”.  Palin blathers about not wanting to “redefine marriage” but is “tolerant”.  Biden doesn’t support “gay marriage”, but no civil distinction between the two.  So what the heck is Biden talking about?

9:40 Palin:  Petraeus, surge, etc.  You’ve heard it before.   Accuses Obama of withholding money from troops.

9:41  Biden: McCain also voted to withhold money from the troops – because the bill had a timeline.  Wants to “end this war”.

9:43 Palin says that withdrawal is “a white flag of surrender”.  Brings up “cutting off finding for the troops” again.  If at first you don’t succeed …

9:46  Biden talks about Pakistan.  An unstable Pakistan, he says, more a worry than Iran because they already have nukes.

9:48 Palin:  Channeling one of McCain’s more asinine comments from the last debate – that it’s silly to meet with enemy leaders.

9:50 Biden:  Brings up the McCain Spain gaffe again.  I suppose that Palin can’t hit back because McCain doesn’t want to admit he got confused?

9:55 Palin says that you can’t criticize the past if you want to change?  Huh?

9:56 Take one drink every time Biden says “George Bush” – as in, McCain is just like.  It’s true, of course, that you shouldn’t elect another conservative Republican if you want to move away from conservative Republican policies.

9:58  Biden:  “Facts matter”.  Surge won’t work in Afghanistan (according to the military), since we need to build infrastructure, etc. And we don’t spend money there.  3 weeks of Iraq = 7 years of Afghanistan in terms of money.

10:00 Palin’s response:  SURGE!

10:04 Palin really likes that “Obama voted against funding the troops” point.  Wonder if Biden will point out McCain doing the same thing … again?  It’s probably dangerous to attack Biden on his AUMF vote.  McCain voted the same way, and Obama spoke out against it.  Don’t folks vote for the TOP of the ticket?

10:07 Palin says “McCain knows how to win a war”.  He does?

10:09  I think Palin has called herself a “maverick” more than McCain has.  I still say that “maverick” is a title that no one can self-apply.

10:11 Palin says that Obama/Biden ticket will destroy your jobs and raise your taxes.

10:12 Palin: I still don’t get Palin’s whole “you can’t criticize the administration” thing.  If you’re running for change or reform, you kinda have to point out the flaws of the current administration.  Perhaps she doesn’t want to hear McCain being hammered with his recent agreement with everything Bush stands for.

10:18  I’m not sure what Palin was saying about the vice presidency.  Biden at least answered the question.

10:19  Palin has “a connection to the heartland”?  I somehow doubt that someone with a half-million dollar home really has to worry about how they can pay college tuition.

10:21  Palin admits folks are looking for change.  Says McCain’s a “maverick” (twice) and will bring change.  Good opening for Biden to bring up “voted with Bush 90% of the time”.

10:23 Biden takes the opening.  Slams McCain on his rather conservative voting record and his agreement with Bush – he’s not really a “maverick”.

10:28 Palin says exactly the same thing she said before about Obama/McCain “will kill jobs and raise taxes on workers”.  She likes to “answer tough questions” (by not answering them?  Most of what Palin’s said has had little to do with the moderator’s questions.)  Claims to be an “average, middle class” person.  Someone should point out to her what the median annual household income actually is.  It’s okay to be rich, but it’s not okay to lie about it and pretend you’re not.  She gets in a “POW” reference, of sorts, for McCain

10:31 Nice ending by Biden.

PBS pundits say that Palin “held her own”.  This seems to be what the TV folks are saying.  They seem to like the “soccer mom”, “joe sixpack” stuff.  Do most folks really want a “soccer mom” or “joe sixpack” a heartbeat away from the Presidency?

My initial take:  Palin didn’t burst into flames on the stage, so on that scale she did well.  Biden certainly showed that he was much more fit for the office.

Here’s the transcript.

Some debate thoughts

Saturday, September 27th, 2008

Last night, I watched part of the Obama-McCain debate.  Since I only saw about the last half of the debate, I’m not going to try to say who “won”, overall.  But here are a few assorted thoughts.

  • Like many other folks, I found it off-putting that McCain couldn’t bring himself to look at his opponent.  He also took every opportunity to sneer condescendingly at Obama – talking no fewer than five times about how Obama was “naive” or “didn’t understand” some point of foreign policy.  Oddly enough, he did this even on Georgia. where Obama and McCain are rather similar.  For the part of the debate I saw live, McCain was in full-on “bitter old man” mode.  Bitter, obviously, that some young guy is running for the office that he is rightfully entitled to.  Especially bitter that this young guy is currently winning.
  • If you have to call yourself a meverick, are you really a maverick?  That’s like telling everyone how cool you are instead of actually being cool.
  • How many wars will John McCain start by accident?  Unless he’s much more in control of himself across the table from leaders of rival nations than he was at the debate, quite a few.
  • McCain dug himself a nice, deep hole with the flap over “preconditions”.  Perhaps he should go discuss this with his advisors?
  • I’d like to have seen Obama hit McCain a little harder.  For instance, there was no mention of McCain’s rug-buying expedition with Lindsey Graham, where McCain McCain visited a market while under heavy military guard and then claimed he walked around freely.  Still, I understand that Obama needs to not be seen as overy angry.  He must be the cool-headed leader that Americans can depend on in a crisis.

How could I have missed the most crucial issue of all?  NotVeryBright urges us to consider the flag pin issue! Obama had a flag pin, McCain didn’t!

Keeping up with the meltdown

Thursday, September 25th, 2008

I hear that John McCain has “suspended” his campaign so that he could swoop back to Washington to save our financial industry.

Only he hasn’t actually read the details of the plan the administration want the Congress to pass.

Asked by the NBC affiliate in Cleveland about whether he was prepared to support Paulson’s plan, McCain said, “I have not had a chance to see it in writing. I have to examine it.”

I’m not campaigning, but I do have a pretty busy schedule.  But my lab students have just started plotting their data for the freezing of acetic acid.  That gives me a few moments where I don’t have much else to do.  Here’s Paulson’s plan.

Now that I’ve read the plan (and my students are still plotting), I have some qualms with it.

Sec. 6. Maximum Amount of Authorized Purchases.

The Secretary’s authority to purchase mortgage-related assets under this Act shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time

Aren’t conservatives generally against “throwing money at a problem”?  That’s always the line wen someone wants to use a little more money to improve education.  7×1011 dollars is a lot of money.  It’s about $2300 from each person living in the USA.

How will this sum of money help address the root causes of the meltdown?  At least with education spending, you can generally point at a few things that can be fixed with the money (class sizes, worn facilities, etc.).  Does buying bad debt off of financial institutions discourage them from taking on more bad debt in the future?

Sec. 8. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

Anyone else have problems with this?  Lack of oversight of the financial markets is part of the reason we’re in this mess.  How will giving someone a bunch of our money and agreeing to not hold him accountable in any way for it fix the problem?

New poll tells us … the obvious

Thursday, August 21st, 2008

Courtesy of The State, here’s a poll whose results will surprise no one:

Likely voters in the Deep South — those in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and South Carolina — preferred McCain by a 25-point margin, 56 percent to 31 percent.

I wonder why that is?

Likely Mississippi Voter

Likely Mississippi Voter

Maybe voters in the Deep South are informed about McCain’s stands on the issues and prefer them to Obama’s?

“Illegal immigration needs to be controlled,” said 76-year-old Evelyn Perry of Fort Mill, who was among those surveyed. “I just haven’t really understood what (McCain’s position) is on that — but it needs to be controlled.”

Even without those specifics, Perry said she trusts McCain more. “Overall, I just think McCain understands better.”

Or … maybe not.  But I can sympathize with Ms. Perry just a bit.  John McCain himself hasn’t figured out what his immigration position is.

Many mansions

Thursday, August 21st, 2008

Notverybright wants to know how many houses John McCain owns.  John McCain wants to know how many houses he owns, too. Obama knows, and here’s the answer:
h

Seven.  Or at least, that’s what we thinkThis house-owning stuff is hard.

From the front lines

Wednesday, August 20th, 2008

… of the War On CrackThe State reports that:

A proposed ordinance banning sagging pants was up for second and final reading Monday, but [Pamplico] Mayor Gene Gainey said council tabled the issue at the recommendation of town attorney Jimmy Epps.

“We’re not doing away with it, but we’re going to get a little more information on it before we get any deeper into this particular ordinance,” Gainey said.

Pamplico plumbers, undoubtedly, are breathing easier at the news.

Pamplico joins the War

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

In South Carolina, we’re certainly not ashamed to import silly ideas from other states.  According to WPDE, Pamplico is joining the War On Crack.

No, not that War On Crack.  This War On Crack.

Last month, [Pamplico] town council took the first step to make it illegal to wear saggy pants in the city limits.

Officials said they haven’t discussed how they would enforce the law.

I’m guessing officials also haven’t announced what effect this law would have on actual crimes.

Perhaps the Pamplico town council merely hates plumbers?