Here’s an interesting set headlines that popped up in The State – one right after the other – in my RSS reader:
Headlines
The message? It’s not, apparently, that gambling is wrong. It’s that the powers that control gambling in the state do not want competition.
When I arrived at work this morning, I thought I heard the sound of fireworks…
Barack Obama, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize
… but no, it was the sound of thousands of wingnut heads exploding at once.
This article is making the rounds today. While it’s no surprise that Democrats find South Carolina senator Jim DeMint’s right-wing posturing useful, it was interesting to see this little nugget at the bottom:
At a recent town-hall meeting in suburban Simpsonville, a man stood up and told Rep. Robert Inglis (R-S.C.) to “keep your government hands off my Medicare.”
“I had to politely explain that, ‘Actually, sir, your health care is being provided by the government,’ ” Inglis recalled. “But he wasn’t having any of it.”
Here we have the real problem with the current health care debate – distilled down into just seven words: “Keep your government hands off my Medicare.” The reason we’re having much of a debate at all over these issues is that many people simply don’t know whe’s providing their health care or what they’re paying for it.
it’s hard to say anything really coherant about South Carolina governor Mark Sanford’s disappearance on the Appalachian Trail to Argentina, largely because the story is such an incoherant mess.
TPMmuckraker has a chronology of the events in this bizarre scandal, but this image from The Daily Show probably makes events just as clear as the chronology does.
Where in the world is Mark Sanford?
The thing that is obvious in all of this, though, is that Sanford was trying to hide something.
What was he hiding? Jjust your typical garden variety party-of-family-values unfaithfulness. He was cheating on his wife.
Gov. Mark Sanford admitted today that his secret trip to Argentina over Father’s Day weekend was to visit a woman he is having an affair with.
[…]
“I have developed a relationship with what started as a dear dear friend from Argentina. It began very innocently as I expect many of these things do, just casual email back and forth,” Sanford said. “But here recently this last year developed into something much more.”
Did he, perhaps, get a hot tip from our attorney general on how to use Craigslist to meet exotic people? Was Sanford trying to upstage John Ensign’s media coverage? Or was he merely ensuring that the only political party who will get anywhere near him as a presidential nominee in 2012 will be the Libertarians?
Sanford’s going to need another press conference to answer these burning questions. 🙂
At any rate, we now know that the governor of South Carolina handles affairs of state about as well as he handles his other … affairs.
April unemployment data has been released, and South Carolina again ranks third in the nation in unemployment at 11.5%. Only Michigan (12.9%) and Oregon (12.0%) fared more poorly than we.
The State notes that our seasonally adjusted unemployment is a new record for South Carolina – highest since recording started in 1976.
When does this become a “depression” rather than a “recession”?
The comments on that The State link above are interesting.
Comments from The State's article
Right away we have a couple of folks blaming Obama for South Carolina’s economic woes, while at the same time our Governor is adamant about refusing any help from the Obama administration. He’s so adamant about this that he’s filed a lawsuit about it.
Perhaps someone can educate me. How is our state government’s refusal to accept help from the Obama administration Obama’s fault?
(Crossposted to Indigo Journal diary…)
The Morning News has an interesting way of describing what we need to do to get our rates of teen pregnancy under control:
South Carolina spends $3.8 million on teen pregnancy prevention. Much of it has gone to programs focused only on abstinence. Though abstinence is part of the solution, it must be combined with reality-based sex education.
Emphasis mine. Abstinence-only sex ed versus “reality-based” sex ed is a nice way of putting it. It at least admits what our real problem is … abstinence-only sex ed isn’t actually sex ed at all. It wastes resources without getting us much in return.
Here’s the quote of the day, from South Carolina’s governor Mark Sanford. He’s talking about the stimulus money and his battle with the legislature over taking it and using it:
“The logical question would be then ‘Why have a governor?’” Sanford asked. “I think it’s a big deal and has far-reaching implications. Let’s see how the House and Senate votes and what the people of South Carolina say on this.”
Good question. Many South Carolinians are probably asking themselves this question right now – as our Governor continues to polish his “fiscal conservative” credentials for a Presidential bid while South Carolina’s unemployment creeps up .
Of course, we didn’t learn our lesson in 2006, when we had this guy as governor:
But a growing chorus of critics, including leaders of his own G.O.P., fear that his thrift has brought the state’s economy to a standstill. This summer, Standard & Poor’s lowered South Carolina’s coveted AAA-bond rating to AA+, citing unemployment of 6.3% and a per capita income ($27,172) stuck in the nation’s bottom fifth. The state had just lost its bid for a $500 million Airbus plant; [he] was widely accused of making a miserly effort to lure the aerospace giant. Business leaders are losing patience with [his] vetoes of budget items like trade centers and tourism marketing. Even G.O.P. bosses charge that he is worse at economic development than at grandstanding
… and put him right back in the Governor’s mansion.
(The quoted paragraph from Time cites data from 2005. Remember when 6 or so percent unemployment was bad, and an unemployment rate of 11% meant that your state had been wiped out by a natural disaster? My, how times change…)
Crossposted to Indigo Journal…
Fort Sumter (public domain image from Wikipedia)
Not willing to let Rick Perry steal all the secessionist glory, some folks in South Carolina are getting in on the act.
Conservative groups are calling on South Carolina legislators to pass a measure asserting state sovereignty.
The resolution declares South Carolina has the right to ignore any federal law or policies it deems unconstitutional. It notes the 10th Amendment gives all powers not delegated to the federal government to states.
That sounds a little like this:
The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of the other slaveholding States, she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue.
How well did that work out for us lsat time, hmm?
(Or perhaps this is more like the Ordinance of Nullification in 1832
We, therefore, the people of the State of South Carolina, in convention assembled, do declare and ordain and it is hereby declared and ordained, that the several acts and parts of acts of the Congress of the United States, […] are unauthorized by the constitution of the United States, and violate the true meaning and intent thereof and are null, void, and no law, nor binding upon this State, its officers or citizens; and all promises, contracts, and obligations, made or entered into, or to be made or entered into, with purpose to secure the duties imposed by said acts, and all judicial proceedings which shall be hereafter had in affirmance thereof, are and shall be held utterly null and void.
… which didn’t work out so well for South Carolina, either.)
It would be really nice, though, if conservatives would stop talking treason just because they’re upset that their last president tanked the economy and their last presidential candidate (unsurprisingly) didn’t win the next election.
Today’s the day citizens are supposed to mail off their tax forms. And in honor of that day, here are some interesting links:
Kevin Drum has a in interesting post about who’s really getting “soaked” by our tax structure: “How to think about taxes” Hint: It’s probably not who you think.
Closer to home, we have lots of articles about “tax protesters” coming out of the woodwork to protest that … the federal government requires money to operate!
“What works in America is always and has always been freedom,” DeMint said. “The only way we’re going to stop our…spending is to do these (rallies) all over the country as long as it takes to take back our government.”
Or, we could have simply not rushed into Iraq. But I digress… How does DeMint think we should control spending?
DeMint urged support for proposals such as school-choice and private health care over reforms that give government greater control.
… by giving tax money away to unaccountable private schools and pouring money into the impenetrable bureaucratic hell of private insurance companies, of course! That’s true freedom! Makes about as much sense as anything else tax protesters say, I suppose.
The “FairTax” folks are also getting in on the act:
Advocates of the FairTax also will rally at the Township Auditorium this evening. The FairTax would replace federal income taxes with a 30 percent (23 percent when included in the price) sales tax on services and sales of new goods.
Why this gets any traction in South Carolina (aside from the crazy truck guys) is beyond me. We already tried swapping out property taxes for increased sales taxes in this state. Now we have higher sales taxes and the state budget is still screwed.
Last but not least, here’s Indigo Journal’s open thread on the tax protests – with a few pictures: [Tax protesters open thread]
Happy tax day!
There are some folks out there who wonder how we in South Carolina managed to elect officials that want to play crazy, stupid games with the federal stimulus package, the state budget, and our underfunded state services.
Let me introduce you to conservatism, South Carolina style:
Conservative performance art, right side. Click to enlarge.
What it says:
DEMS DRIVE BUY MEDIA
LARGEST TERRORIST
GROUP IN AMERICA
OBAMA INSANE – THEIR
LEADER – CHILDREN ARE
A PUNISHMENT – ABORT
OUR GOVERNMENT IS A DEN
OF SELFSERVING LIARS
THIEVES – SELLING OUT
HARD WORKING TAX
PAYERS TO ENRICH THEM
SELVES & FRIENDS
And on the other side …
Cnservative performance art, left side. Click to enlarge
It says:
OUT WITH THE OLD CROOKS
IN WITH THE NEW CROOKS
CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE
IN BILLION GIVEN TO
CONGRESS FROM GROUPS
THAT GOT BAIL OUT MONEY
And there you have it! South Carolina’s conservative values – as articulated by the “crazy truck guy”.