Archive for March, 2007

Friday Cat: Cat TARDIS

Friday, March 30th, 2007

It doesn’t look much like a police box, but Rusty has her own TARDIS.

Clearly, this blue basket is much larger on the inside than it appears on the outside!


Find more animal friends on the Friday Ark

Friday Cate: That’s my bear!

Friday, March 30th, 2007

I missed posting a picture of Cate last week, since we had our hands full with Cate’s first illness. (Not an ear infection, surprisingly enough!) She’s better now, and back to grabbing everything in sight.

This is her bear!

What homeschooling is about

Friday, March 30th, 2007

Ed Leap has an editorial on the Greenville News site called Homeschooling is about far more than education.

So, what does Ed think homeschooling is about? What are the advantages? Many things:

People educate their children at home for many reasons. For some, it is a way to cloister their families from the world. That seems, to our modern, connected, socially conscious society, like a backwards idea. And indeed, in rare instances, the children do not benefit, but develop an unfortunate paranoia, transmitted from worried parents. On the other hand, a few minutes with the news, a few hours looking at the statistics on drugs, crime and sex in our culture, and a little “cloistering” doesn’t seem so bad.

I’m getting suspicious here. This sort of reasoning usually leads to crazy fundie talk. Ed seems to be saying that because people have sex, it might not be a bad thing to lock your kids away from the outside world.

Ed then outlines some more advantages of homeschooling.

Scripture doesn’t conflict with learning; in fact, reading it can be a learning experience in itself, and a series of lessons in culture and history. There can’t be a concern over separation of church and state when the state isn’t involved.

That’d depend on how literally you read said Scripture. Read it too literally, and it can conflict with learning.

Furthermore, the homeschool family can ask pointed questions about controversies without being accused of being Cro-Magnons: “What are the weaknesses of arguments for and against evolution?” Or the more heinous, “Could it be that global warming isn’t a problem?” The scandal! It’s getting harder and harder to have divergent ideas about anything in our modern world of alleged diversity; except at home.

Usually, when someone uses the phrase arguments for and against evolution, he’s a creationist who wants to teach creationism. That’s simply because these “arguments against” are bunk. They are merely smoke used to cast doubt upon settled science that conflicts with a narrow interpretation of Scripture. Homeschooling, of course, gives the homeschooler the freedom to teach these bad arguments as if they were actually true. But I don’t really consider this an advantage.

Finally, Ed coughs up the crazy.

We like the fact that our children can start to learn the critical skills of rhetoric and argument, so that they aren’t one day ambushed by college professors who would happily bully away their deepest held beliefs.

Another advantage: the homeschooler is free to drill apologetics into their child’s head just in case she ever meets one of those evil, atheistic college professors. Did you know that those evil professors line up in front of the dorms to bully away the deeply held religious beliefs of new students as they arrive? it’s brutal, I tell you! Brutal!

Why is it that almost every time I see an opinion piece about homeschooling, it drifts off into fundie Bizarro world?

This might have something to do with it. 30% of homeschoolers cite religion as their primary motivation for homeschooling, and more than 70% cite religion as at least one of the reasons they homeschool.

I wonder if Ed’s merely one of the 70%, or one of the 30%…


For the record, I’m not actually opposed to homeschooling. I may not do it myself, or think that for most people it’s a very wise thing to do. I certainly do not think that anyone deserves a tax break for homeschooling. However, I think a parent has a right to educate their child as they see fit.

Blue side: Democratic candidates on health care

Thursday, March 29th, 2007

Talking Points Memo’s Election Central has some information on the Democratic candidates views on fixing our broken health care system.

For Clinton, Obama, and Edwards – things appear about the same as I said in my last post on this topic. The Election Central post, though, mentions a few other Democratic hopefuls:

Bill Richardson
He wants to use some of the money we’ve been throwing into Iraq to help fund universal health care, and wants to help people buy insurance using tax credits. That last sounds too Bushy for me. Given what insurance costs, a tax credit for a middle or lower income person just isn’t going to help uch.

Dennis Kucinich
He wants a single-payer system: “Medicare for all”.

I like this quote:

Health care is a right, not a privilege.

Sounds about right to me.

Break time! Dark Cavern for tha Atari 2600

Tuesday, March 27th, 2007

[Break Time! is a series of posts about video games that Rick has spent entirely too much time with over the years.]

One of my hobbies is collecting and restoring old video game systems. Not arcade machines, since I don’t have a house nearly large enough for a bunch of arcade machines, but consoles.

As a kid, I owned an Atari 2600 console – which gave me years of entertainment until it had an unfortunate run-in with a thunderstorm. Many years later, I bought a secondhand Atari 2600 at a flea market, then dug my old cartridges out of the attic. I was bitten by the collecting bug, and now I have a “library” of old game consoles and their games.

There are some who say that Atari 2600 games were the best games ever made. I am not one of those people. As someone who owns nearly three hundred different Atari cartridges, I’ll go on record to state that most of the Atari 2600 cartridge library is complete crap. The only entertainment value many of these games had was the “wow” factor: you could actually control the images on the television screen!

In 2007, most of the Atari 2600 game library is worthless – unless you’re interested in the evolution of video games. But there are some games that stand out; games that were more than just moving blocks around on the television screen. Dark Cavern, by Mattel (a.k.a. “M Network”) is one of those games.

You are a man in an unfortunate situation. You have a gun, and are thrown into a dungeon populated by spiders (which paralyze you), bulletsuckers (which … suck your bullets away), and killer robots. The robots chase you around the dungeon relentlessly, and shoot at you if they “see” you. You can shoot back at all of these enemies. There’s a catch: You can run out of bullets, but the robots have an endless supply.

You can scrounge up more bullets by picking up a flashing “gun” that appears occasionally in the dungeon. This is often harder that it sounds; the gun often pops up in the midst of a gang of robots, and disappears if you don’t claim it quickly enough. Such is life in the Dark Cavern.

On the easiest difficulty level, you initially battle only two robots. Once you blow away enough robots, the game sends out three robots at a time. Then four. The robots get faster as you kill more of them. They also get “smarter”. Earlier robots can only shoot in the direction they’re facing. Later robots rotate their heads to face in all directions – making it impossible to score an easy kill by sneaking up behind a robot.

(These screen shots were taken on the highest difficulty setting – four robots with rotating heads.)

As you run, hide, and shoot, you hear the roar of the robots prowling the dungeon – a sound that changes depending on how many robots are in the maze. If you’ve managed to blast all the robots, it’s eerily quiet – until the next batch of smarter, faster robots thunders in to kill you.

All in all, Dark Cavern is a surprisingly intense game. It’s one of the rare group of Atari titles that will actually entertain you in 2007. Or at least, it will entertain you until the killer robots blow you away. And they will blow you away. This is an old-school game which cares nothing for your self esteem. You will not win.

… but you might get a high score.


Additional note: Dark Cavern is one of the few games of its era to have “friendly fire”. The robots can and will occasionally shoot each other trying to get you. In Dark Cavern, a bullet is a bullet.

Friday cat: The clean cat

Friday, March 23rd, 2007

Much is often made of the aversion cats have to water. We are told that cats hate water, and will go nowhere near it unless they have to drink.

[Tom]

However, this is not true of Tom. Tom is our “bathing” cat – as you can see in the small picture above.

Still not convinced? See Tom bathe for yourself! [3.9MB AVI]


Find more furry, feathery, and scaly friends on the Friday Ark!

“Not just a little bit over the line”

Tuesday, March 20th, 2007

Here’s a little public service announcement to all of you budding science teachers. If you’re a new biology teacher in a public high school, it’ll do you good to stick to teaching science.

If the article above is correct, Kris Helphinstine couldn’t last longer than eight days as a biology teacher before unleashing the crazy:

Kris Helphinstine included Biblical references in material he provided to students and gave a PowerPoint presentation that made links between evolution, Nazi Germany and Planned Parenthood.

The Biblical references were probably merely inappropriate in a high school biology class. But “links between evolution, Nazi Germany, and Planned Parenthood”? Do we really need the tinfoil-hat conspiracy crowd teaching our high schoolers? No, we don’t. The local school board felt that way, too. They fired Helphinstine:

“I think his performance was not just a little bit over the line,” board member Jeff Smith said. “It was a severe contradiction of what we trust teachers to do in our classrooms.”

In his defense, Helphinstine said that he was merely trying to teach “critical thinking”. He must have neglected to inform the students of his objectives, since they were apparently more confused by his materials than anything.

As for me, I’m not buying Helphinstine’s excuse. There is plenty of material you can use to teach “critical thinking” in science classes without loading up on the Bible, Planned Parenthood, or Nazi conspiracies. Even if his intentions were honorable***, he led his class into an educational minefield. He shouldn’t have been surprised when one of those mines went off.


***It’d be nice to see the materials used in the class. That’d help us judge his intentions.


Update: It doesn’t look so good for Helphinstine. More here

Friday cat: Stealth cat

Friday, March 16th, 2007

We don’t have as many good pictures of our cat Tom as we do of our other two cats. Why not? Tom is built with advanced stealth materials that render him invisible to the auto-focus mode of most cameras. So, we have a lot of pictures of Tom that could easily pass as UFOs – if this were that kind of web site!

But Tom’s advanced stealth technology might have finally met its match. Our new camera (a Canon Rebel XT) is a lot better at catching Tom … in focus!

[Tom]
Tom … in focus

Just don’t let Tom know that he’s not quite as stealthy as he once was!


Find more furry friends on the Friday Ark.

Friday Cate: Sleeping like a baby

Friday, March 16th, 2007

I took this picture a day or two ago. Cate’s napping in the carseat after her ride home from the day care.

[Sleeping Cate]

She’s “sleeping like a baby”. But I wonder … where, exactly, does the phrase “sleeping like a baby” come from? The phrase as most people use it refers to sleeping peacefully.

But babies? If our baby is typical (Google search suggests that she is), then “sleeping like a baby” is taking short naps. Between the naps?

[Awakened Cate]

Between naps, Cate wants to see everything. Lately, she’s also wanted to grab everything and put it into her mouth. The world must taste great!

Oh, and if you’d like a phrase that really does mean “sleeping peacefully”, might I suggest: “Sleeping like a cat”?

[Tom]

Rock your desktop!

Friday, March 9th, 2007

A while back, I posted about amethyst. That post included some images, but none really large enough for use as desktop wallpaper. I’ve been testing out with the new family camera, and I’ve taken a few more pictures of my amethyst samples. These new pictures are a little more suitable for wallpaper. Here they are:

Amethyst image #1 (1024×768 JPG)
Amethyst image #2 (1024×768 JPG)
Amethyst image #3 (1024×768 JPG)

Each image is approximately 150K in size. #1 and #2 are the same stone from different angles, and #3 is a different (darker) stone. Enjoy!