Archive for January, 2007

Childhood dreams, revisited

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

Ask any kid who was old enough to hang out in an arcade in the early eighties what he would really love to have in his house. Chances are, the answer would be … an arcade game. Or, many arcade games.

More that twenty years later, home consoles barely break a sweat delivering the graphics and sound that we could only get at the arcades back then. But there’s still something about an arcade machine. Maybe it’s standing up in front of the machine. Maybe it’s the large control panel right up beside the screen, where the arcade sounds can blare in your face. I don’t know what it is – but there’s something

Back in 2005, I happened across the Big Electronic Games Ltd. Midway Arcade at the local Target, which promised to deliver a multi-game arcade system to the living room. The Midway machine was a disappointment. The monitor was small and of very low quality. As a result, the games looked awful. The games didn’t sound very good, either. But above all else, there was the asking price: $499. That’s a lot of money to blow on a machine that plays twelve games on a small, blurry screen.

In late 2006, Target carried another Big Electronic Games Ltd. product – the Konami Arcade – this time with a lower price of $399.

$399 is still steep, but this was Target. Target eventually puts things on clearance. Deep clearance. As a result, here’s what my living room now looks like:

[Konami Arcade]
Patty says that Cate’s going to “grow up in the funhouse”!

The machine comes partially assembled in a single, smaller box that I was able to fit easily into the back of my Jeep.

The Konami Arcade has three sections. The middle section, with all the electronics, joysticks, and screen is pre-assembled. The top and bottom sections have to be assembled after unpacking. Assembly was fairly easy – everything is pre-drilled so that you only need a pair of screwdrivers to build the machine. One gripe I had about assembly was that one of the pre-drilled holes was drilled at the wrong angle, so one screw (out of the many that hold the machine together) wouldn’t sink properly.

The bottom of the machine is a storage cabinet with two small shelves. (This is done, perhaps, as a selling point to whoever in your house doesn’t play video games?) But enough about storage and shelves. It”s time to talk about the games.

The Konami Arcade comes with a dozen games, all from the eighties.

  1. Hyper Sports – Konami (1984)
  2. Time Pilot ’84 – Konami (1984)
  3. Shao-Lin’s Road – Konami (1985)
  4. Jungler – Konami / Stern (1981)
  5. Super Basketball – Konami (1984)
  6. Vs. Castlevania – Konami / Nintendo (1987)
  7. Blades of Steel – Konami (1987)
  8. Green Beret – Konami (1985) (released as Rush’n Attack here in the US)
  9. Contra – Konami (1987)
  10. Frogger – Sega / Gremlin / Konami (1981)
  11. Gyruss – Konami (1983)
  12. Scramble – Konami / Stern (1981)

(dates from the Killer List of Video Games and the attract modes of the games)

Not a bad list, though if I were designing this machine I’d have replaced Blades of Steel and Super Basketball with Gradius and Lifeforce.

You control all of these games with two sets of 8-way joysticks and buttons:

[Konami Arcade joysticks]
Joysticks

You can see six buttons on the panel for each player (a holdover from the Midway machine?), but only the top three buttons are actually wired. The lower three buttons don’t even “click” when pressed like the upper ones do.

You play the games on a 15″ screen mounted into the cabinet. Unlike the Midway Arcade’s screen, the Konami Arcade features a higher-resolution computer monitor as the display. How do I know? Take a look.

[Konami Arcade monitor]
This system uses a computer monitor mounted sideways into the cabinet. You can adjust the monitor’s settings if you turn your head a bit.

As a result, the screen display is nice and sharp – with no flickering or dot crawl. I wish the monitor was a little larger, but I have no complaints about the picture clarity.

Game sounds come out of a front-facing speaker mounted on the front panel. The volume is adjustable (and can be turned off entirely). At lower volumes, some of the games have distorted sound – Contra is particularly bad at the two lowest volume settings. Turning the volume up makes Contra‘s sounds much less distorted, but is not an option when the baby is asleep.

To start a game, select from the menu, and hit either the 1P or 2P start button to get to the game.

[Konami Arcade menu]
Select a game from the menu

When you hit either start button, the game begins immediately (after a 1-2 second pause while the game loads), rather than simply going to the game’s attract mode or coin inserted screen.

I’d prefer a way to select a game that would take you to the game’s attract mode, but I suppose that I can get used to the way the Konami Arcade starts games.

When a game is over, you get to enter your initials for a high score (if that particular game supports initials), and the game goes briefly into attract mode. After a few seconds, the machine goes back to the game select menu. I think the machine would “feel” more like the arcade if the games would stay in attract mode longer.

High scores are saved, even after you turn the machine off. You can access the high scores from the main game menu by pushing the joystick to the left or right … because bragging rights are important.

How are the games? The ones I most remember (Time Pilot ’84, Gyruss, Scramble, and Green Beret) seem pretty faithful to their arcade counterparts. The controls respond well; in other words, my dying was my own fault and not a lack of response from the buttons or stick. The graphics are sharp and look good. The sound (aside from the distortion problem in Contra) was passable, but could have been better.

You can pause the games during the action by holding down the two game start buttons together. This brings up a menu which allows you to adjust the volume, blocking the game graphics. Since I was using a digital camera, I couldn’t get pictures of any fast-moving game graphics. I was able to manage a couple of shots of the attract modes of two of the games. (I blocked out the family initials – it’s not a graphics glitch in the games.)

[Konami Arcade Time Pilot '84]
Time Pilot ’84

[Konami Arcade Gyruss]
Gyruss

To sum up, the Konami Arcade is a vast improvement over Big Electronic Games Ltd’s Midway Arcade machine from 2005. It still costs too much at $399 for a purchase, but it’s worth a look if your local Target is clearing them out for under $200.

On the minus side, the sound from the Konami Arcade is disappointing. It’s loud enough, but isn’t as clear as it should be – especially at lower volumes. The games don’t display their attract modes long enough for you to figure out the controls (if there’s a game you don’t remember well) before going back to the main menu. And, of course, there’s the small monitor.

On the plus side,. the small monitor does give a decent picture, the controls are responsive, and the machine saves your high scores for future bragging. The assortment of games gives you a little something for everyone (side-scrolling shooter fans excepted – Scramble is no Gradius). You can also move the machine easily – should you decide you want the machine in some other room, you can disassemble/reassemble it into its three sections and move it very easily. And, it’s just cool to have a stand-up machine in the house.

Since the system incorporates what appears to be a standard computer monitor, I wonder how difficult of a project it would be to convert the Konami Arvade into a MAME cabinet – replacing the guts of the machine with a small PC. But that’s a project for another day – I just got this thing and I don’t want to tear it apart just yet! 🙂

No, thanks. I just ate.

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

Via Fark, here’s a bit of news.

[Manager Puts Camera In Waffle House Bathroom]
Manager Puts Camera in Waffle House Bathroom

The article, in case you can’t read the print on this screen capture, talks about a man who was arrested after mounting a wireless video camera under the sink in the women’s bathroom of a Waffle House.

What I want to know is simply this … WHY IS THERE A “WATCH VIDEO” LINK ON THE RIGHT???

Friday Cate: Classic Pooh

Friday, January 26th, 2007

I wonder what Cate’s thinking right about now.

[Classic Pooh!]
Cate with a Classic Pooh bib

I wonder if it’s something like this.

You know, this is a very nice bib. But my hands taste a whole lot better.

Friday cat: Speak up!

Friday, January 26th, 2007

Speak up, human!

[Rusty: I can only half hear you]
Rusty: I can only half hear you

The health care jiggle?

Thursday, January 25th, 2007

As some of y’all know, the Shrimp and Grits family grew in October. Now, the bills are starting to roll in. Health care bills, that is – bills from the hospital, where my wife gave birth. Bills from the doctors at the hospital. Bills from the anesthesiologist. Bills from the pediatrician. More bills from the hospital.

In short, never-ending medical bills – and none of them cheap.

So, when I heard that President Bush was going to address health care in his State of the Union address, I was interested. Health care costs in this country are ballooning.

Over the past few years, I’ve seen

  • my premiums go up (and up, and up)
  • my deductible go up along with my premiums
  • my out-of-pocket maximums go up
  • my copays go up, especially for prescription drugs. (To add insult to injury, almost every time I’ve gotten a medicine prescribed that wasn’t an antibiotic, I’ve had to go through trying to fill the prescription, having it denied by insurance, then having to get the doctor to call the insurance company and essentially beg them to cover the medicine.)

Any kind of meaningful health care reform is going to have to address a lot of things. We need to find ways to control costs, ways to reduce the "red tape" people go through to get care, ways to make sure that all Americans can get the care they need, ways to ensure that families won’t lose everything if a member gets a long-term illness, et cetera. That’s a tall order.

Here’s what Bush said:

A future of hope and opportunity requires that all our citizens have affordable and available health care. When it comes to health care, government has an obligation to care for the elderly, the disabled, and poor children. We will meet those responsibilities. For all other Americans, private health insurance is the best way to meet their needs. But many Americans cannot afford a health insurance policy.

On what basis does Bush assume that private health insurance is the best way to meet the needs of most Americans? I have private health insurance. It seems to be more a part of the problem than part of the solution. The private insurer takes my money, provides me with little or no care without me paying even more for it through deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses, and hassles me when my doctor prescribes medicines that they think cost too much. Plus, they don’t pay one cent towards any preventative care.

Bush continues:

Tonight, I propose two new initiatives to help more Americans afford their own insurance. First, I propose a standard tax deduction for health insurance that will be like the standard tax deduction for dependents. Families with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $15,000 of their income. Single Americans with health insurance will pay no income or payroll taxes on $7,500 of their income. With this reform, more than 100 million men, women, and children who are now covered by employer-provided insurance will benefit from lower tax bills.

Say what? Bush’s proposal to fix the health care system in this country is … a tax cut???

(I’ve since seen that it’d be a tax increase or at best a wash for some – those who have decent employer-provided insurance.)

I need some help here. I’d like someone to explain to me how jiggling the tax code this way is going to stop the upward spiral of health care costs and get Americans hassle-free access to quality care. How does this proposal address the rising prices of prescription drugs? How does it cut through the massive piles of paperwork and bills that those who are lucky enough to have insurance deal with?

Assuming it gives a few people a temporary financial boost (which will probably correct itself within a few years), how is this not the equivalent to putting a Band-Aid over a severed arm?

Bush again:

At the same time, this reform will level the playing field for those who do not get health insurance through their job. For Americans who now purchase health insurance on their own, my proposal would mean a substantial tax savings – $4,500 for a family of four making $60,000 a year. And for the millions of other Americans who have no health insurance at all, this deduction would help put a basic private health insurance plan within their reach. Changing the tax code is a vital and necessary step to making health care affordable for more Americans.

So what’s "basic" health insurance? Extremely high deductibles and exremely limited coverage? ("Safe Auto" for health?) Wouldn’t this proposal simply lead to people buying this "basic" insurance to get the tax break, driving the prices of halfway decent insurance plans even higher?

My second proposal is to help the States that are coming up with innovative ways to cover the uninsured. States that make basic private health insurance available to all their citizens should receive Federal funds to help them provide this coverage to the poor and the sick. I have asked the Secretary of Health and Human Services to work with Congress to take existing Federal funds and use them to create "Affordable Choice" grants. These grants would give our Nation’s Governors more money and more flexibility to get private health insurance to those most in need.

Thinking back on this part of Bush’s speech, this thought struck me: Those most in need do not need private health insurance. What those most in need do need is health care.

There are many other ways that Congress can help. We need to expand Health Savings Accounts … help small businesses through Association Health Plans … reduce costs and medical errors with better information technology … encourage price transparency … and protect good doctors from junk lawsuits by passing medical liability reform. And in all we do, we must remember that the best health care decisions are made not by government and insurance companies, but by patients and their doctors.

I’m all for upgrading the archaic information technology systems in use in the medical field. On the patient side, the reams of paperwork are a major hassle. Every time I’ve seen a new doctor, I’ve had to fill out a brand new set of papers. I don’t imagine it’s any better for the doctors, who must be positively buried in paperwork. And these mountains of paper do lead to error. Not too long ago, my records at one doctor’s office got mixed together with someone else’s. Luckily, the doctor caught on – it wsa pretty obvious that I wasn’t being treated for a stroke. (I was being treated for hay fever.)

And I’m all for price transparency. Getting an itemized bill out of the local hospital is almost impossible (but it’s needed to get reimbursed by pre-tax plans like MoneyPlus). It’s pretty obvious, though, that the hospital simply doesn’t want to you know what you’re being charged for. (We’ve been double-billed several times.) Sigh. Only in America do you go into the hospital for one service, then get a two dozen bills for it afterwards.

Medical liability reform? I might be able to get behind that with some evidence that "junk" malpractice suits really are a major reason health care costs are so high today.

In summary, I’m pretty underwhelmed by Bush’s new health care tax jiggle. Maybe some of y’all can enlighten me on what good is supposed to come of this?


Edited to add:
Stephen Colbert weighs in on the Bush health care plan. It’s all so clear to me now.

Press any key to continue

Saturday, January 20th, 2007

Whenever my old laptop asked me to press any key to continue, here’s the key I always wanted to use.

[The Upshit key]
I’ve got your “any” key right here!**


**Yes, that really is a picture of an actual key on my old laptop. No, I didn’t deliberately try to wear the key out that way. 🙂

Render unto Caesar …

Saturday, January 20th, 2007

I’ve talked about Kent Hovind on this blog before. He’s the guy who calls himself “Dr. Dino” and fancies himself able to disprove not only biological evolution but also most of modern science by citing Bible verses.

Well, there’s one Bible verse he apparently forgot. Matthew 22:21

Then saith He unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.

The word around the web is that Hovind has been convicted and sentenced to ten years in prison for tax fraud.

Good luck on the prison ministry, “Doctor” D!


Kellie suggested a better sentence: ten years of forcing Hovind to learn real science. But that might be considered cruel and unusual punishment to someone like Hovind. Plus, once his head exploded there would be an awful mess to clean off the walls.

Friday Cate: Zombaby!

Friday, January 19th, 2007

Woe to anyone who wanders into our house at night. They would face …

…the Zombaby!

She hungers … for BRAINS!

[She hungers ... for BRAINS!]
Braaains! Braaaaaains!

Friday cat: The Lap Cat

Friday, January 19th, 2007

It’s hard to believe that our fifteen-pounder – the same cat who gave us a glimpse of Cat Heaven – was once a tiny kitten. But here she is:

[Lap Cat]
Ash – the Lap Cat

She’s still a lap cat – only now she takes up the whole lap.

The beauty of imperfection

Friday, January 12th, 2007

Take a look at the ground around you. Chances are you’ll find some sand. Sand, quite frankly, is boring stuff. It’s rather dull looking, and it’s … pardon the pun … common as dirt.

One of the major components of sand is silica or quartz – known chemically as silicon dioxide, SiO2. Regular quartz can form pretty crystals, but these crystals are still rather dull in terms of color.

When quartz crystals form, they generally don’t do so in a chemically clean environment. In other words, there’s an awful lot of other stuff around. That other stuff can get trapped inside the quartz crystals, leading to imperfections in the quartz structure.

When these impurities are large enough to be seen with the naked eye, they’re called inclusions. Often, inclusions make crystalsl less valuable.

Sometimes impurities get into a crystal at the atomic level. These impurities (called interstitial impurities or substitutional impurities depending on where in the crystal structure they are) can’t be seen with the naked eye. But … if there are enough of them, these impurities affect the crystals properties in a way that can be easily detected.

Take that silicon dioxide – boring ol’ sand – we mentioned earlier. If silicon dioxide crystals form in such a way that the crystal contains trapped iron or manganese ions**, the crystals will look like this:

[A sample of amethyst]
A sample of amethyst

Quite a difference! This is amethyst, an impure (but much prettier) form of quartz.

[Amethyst close-up!]
A different sample of amethyst, up close. Click to see a high resolution image of the whole stone (378K).

Just keep in mind that the impurities in the silicon dioxide crystal that transform it from boring quartz to beautiful amethyst!


**I’ve seen the purple color of amethyst described as being caused by both iron and manganese impurities