Archive for July, 2006

Save your pennies!

Tuesday, July 18th, 2006

Oh darn! Where will I get the raw materials for making brass now?

Almost too weird for words

Tuesday, July 18th, 2006

If you’re one of those who doesn’t believe that our schools should be teaching accepted science (particularly in biology), here’s the sort of person you’ll be proud to call an ally: Kent Hovind:

For years, he has claimed that he is employed by God and has no income or property because everything he owns belongs to God.

… and he likes to think that this will get him out of paying taxes on

$430,500 in cash [withdrawn] from AmSouth Bank between July 20, 2001, and Aug. 9, 2002, with each of 44 withdrawals for $9,500 or $9,600, just below the $10,000 starting point for reporting cash transactions.

Hovind is most widely known for his downright bizarre opinions on the age of the Earth and evolution. Looks like he understands the tax code only slightly better than he understands science.

(via Pharyngula)

Friday animal – Hey, little bird!

Friday, July 14th, 2006

Saw this little guy/gal in the yard a few days ago:

[Little bird]

Aliens vs. Fundamentalists

Thursday, July 13th, 2006

No, unfortunately, it’s not a new video game.

Via Sadly, No!, here is a series of articles called UFOs and the Gospel of Christ, by Ralph C. Barker: Part 1 is here and Part 2 is here.

If you scroll way, way down past the bazillion ads on the Part 1 link, you’ll get to the meat of the article – Seems Barker saw UFOs as a kid:

The only thing I do know is that the objects I saw violated every known law of physics. They flew at very high altitudes and performed almost instant, high speed, ninety-degree turns. Nothing flying, then or now, with the exception of Superman, can do this.

… to which I would simply say that as a kid he might not have been that familiar with every known law of physics. (Who is?)

The interesting thing about this article is that Barker’s point is to attack “New Agers” and/or UFO believers – not necessarily because they are spreading what most folks consider fanciful nonsense, but because

a very strong, obvious, and evil connection does exist between UFOs and the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Barker asserts that people who claim to have contacted aliens report that:

The aliens don’t seem to be threatened by Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, or any other ism. They focus their attacks on Christianity. Could this be because Christianity is the only true religion? This would be my bet.

… or is it more likely that Christianity is simply the dominant religious belief here in the USA? After all, if you’re brought up in the Christian tradition and are going to dream that you were abducted by aliens, it’s not likely that the alien races you make up in your head are going to suddenly give you a lecture on Buddhism.

Now the question is who inhabits the UFOs. Are they aliens? Are they extra terrestrials? Are they from our future? Who or what are they?

I bet you want to know what Barker concludes about the aliens in Part 2, don’t you?

DON’T YOU?

In my youth I held to the idea that they were truly alien visitors. Today, I still think they are alien visitors but not visitors from another planet. I am convinced they are visitors from another dimension, a spiritual dimension. I believe they are demons.

[Emphasis mine]

Now color me crazy, but I do not see how this is any less loony than the whole alien abduction thing.

What disturbs me more than the looniness above, though, is a little later on in the article. Barker bemoans the supposed lack of religiosity in the US (which is unsurprising from a fundamentalist):

Most of us are well aware that there has been a shift in worldviews in America since the 1950s. The biblical worldview that established America and sustained it for so long is losing its place in American society. Humanism, paganism, and other isms are taking center stage.

Barker then points out that many alien monster movies “prior to the 1960s” showed aliens as hostile towards humanity, wanting to destroy or conquer the world, and so forth. He complains that

… movies began to change their perspective as humanism began to permeate our society. Aliens began to be portrayed more often as not as good guys.

Given that science fiction is often social commentary about current events, I don’t find it surprising at all that there were more “aliens as good guys” stories in the 60s and continuing afterwards. It seems to me that a big message of many of these movies was that people who are different than us in some way aren’t always that bad. And, frankly, what in the heck is wrong with that idea? I was not aware that racial tolerance – what quite a few of these “good alien” movies are promoting – was un-Christian!

It’s chemistry joke day

Tuesday, July 11th, 2006

My inboxes (both online and off) have been flooded with this stuff since I got back from vacation, so I thought I’d share some it.

Here’s something my freshmen would say:

Auguste Comte, Cours de philosophie positive, 1830:

Every attempt to employ mathematical methods in the study of chemical questions must be considered profoundly irrational and contrary to the spirit of chemistry…. if mathematical analysis should ever hold a prominent place in chemistry — an aberration which is happily almost impossible — it would occasion a rapid and widespread degeneration of that science.

From the “science wars”:

Anthony Standen, Science is a sacred cow, 1958:

Chemists are, on the whole, like physicists, only ‘less so’. They don’t make quite the same wonderful mistakes, and much what they do is an art, related to cooking, instead of a true science. They have their moments, and their sources of legitimate pride. They don’t split atoms, as the physicists do. They join them together, and a very praiseworthy activity that is.

More from the “science wars”:

A physicist, biologist, and chemist were going to the see the ocean.

The physicist saw the ocean and was fascinated by the waves. He said he wanted to do some research on the fluid dynamics of the waves, walked into the ocean, and never returned.

The biologist said he wanted to do research on the organisms in the ocean and walked into the ocean. He, too, never returned.

The chemist waited for a time, pulled out his laboratory notebook, and wrote: “The physicist and the biologist are soluble in ocean water.”

You had to have had freshman chemistry:

John Desmond Baernal (Irish physicist, 1901-1971) in a Lecture at Birkbeck college, University of London, 1960:

All that glitters may not be gold, but at least it contains free electrons.

I might actually use this one in class:

My name is Bond, Ionic Bond: Taken, not shared!

As someone with degrees in analytical chemistry and chemical engineering, I feel highly qualified to appreciate this joke:

A chemical is a substance that:

  • An organic chemist turns into a foul odor.
  • An analytical chemist turns into a procedure.
  • A physical chemist turns into a straight line.
  • A biochemist turns into a helix.
  • A chemical engineer turns into a profit

Stuff to post in the lab:

Rules of the Lab:

  • If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
  • When you don’t know what you’re doing, do it neatly.
  • Experiments must be reproducible, they should fail the same way each time.
  • First draw your curves, then plot your data.
  • To get linear data, take only two data points.
  • If you must take three data points, there is a sheet of graph paper somewhere that will make them all fall on a straight line.
  • Experience is directly proportional to equipment ruined.
  • Always keep a record of your data. It indicates that you have been working.
  • To do a lab really well, have your report done well in advance.
  • If you can’t get the answer in the usual manner, start at the answer and derive the question.
  • In case of doubt, make it sound convincing.
  • Do not believe in miracles – rely on them.
  • Teamwork is essential, it allows you to blame someone else.
  • All unmarked beakers contain fast-acting, extremely toxic poisons.
  • No experiment is a complete failure. It can always serve as a negative example.
  • Any delicate and expensive piece of glassware will break before any use can be made of it.
  • Hot glass looks just like cold glass.

Worst chemistry joke ever:

Johnny, feeling life a bore,
Drank some H2SO4.
Johnny’s father, an M.D.,
Gave him CaCO3.
Now he’s neutralized, it’s true,
But Johnny’s full of CO2.

South Carolina BBQ – Maurice’s BBQ (Santee)

Monday, July 10th, 2006

If you’ve ever heard about barbecue in South Carolina, you’ve probably heard about Maurice Bessinger and his bright yellow mustard sauce. The main Bessinger restaurant (“Piggie Park”) is in Columbia, but there are also some smaller satellite restaurants around the Columbia area and as far away as Santee, which is where you will find this particular place:

[Maurice's BBQ]
Maurice’s BBQ – just off Exit 98 on I-95

So, how is it? Can you really just pull off of the highway any time of the week and get some good barbecue – fast? We’ll see.

When we entered the restaurant, I got a bit worried. The staff was arguing about how few customers the place had. We stood in front of the register while this argument raged on – with the staff seemingly oblivious to the fact that they had customers – two of them! When the staff finally took notice (after two more customers had lined up behind the two of us), we were able to order some food.

Patty and I ordered two BBQ sandwich plates with “Big Joe” sandwiches. Prices were high. Ordering two “Big Joe” baskets will cost you as just as much as eating at a buffet like Antley’s. Our bill was about $20 including drinks. Here’s what you get with the “Big Joe” basket:

[Big Joe basket]
Big Joe basket: Fries, meteorites, and a small container of slaw

[Big Joe sandwich]
Big Joe sandwich

The “Big Joe” basket comes with fries, slaw, and meteorites. Most BBQ places don’t serve meteorites, so I assume that the dark rocklike things in our sandwich baskets are supposed to be hush puppies.

[meteorites]
Burned up on re-entry

Nope. Those are definitely meteorites, and are completely inedible. They must be included for decorative purposes only.

So how’s the sandwich? For nearly ten bucks, it’d better be large – and it is. There’s a lot of meat inside a “Big Joe” sandwich. The meat has been cooked in Maurice’s mustard sauce. There’s not much sauce in the meat. If you’re not into South Carolina mustard sauce, that’s a good thing. Me, I grew up with the stuff – so I had to pour on more sauce.

The sandwich was okay – except for the large piece of bone (or something else just as hard) in the middle. Be careful biting into a “Big Joe” – since Maurice’s BBQ isn’t very good at picking the bones out of the meat before putting it into a sandwich.

[Hunk of bone]
Imagine biting down hard on this… ouch!

What’s the verdict? Simple – go eat somewhere else. Even if you’re on tthe highway, you’ll have a better experience eating at a buffet like Lone Star (same exit as Maurice’s BBQ). You’ll pay about the same amount of money for better food.