Archive for April, 2006

Classics of Student Literature – The Many Names of Carbonic Acid

Tuesday, April 11th, 2006

Several years ago, I asked a large class of introductory chemistry students to name H2CO3. Since we had just been over the oxyacids (acids that contain hydrogen and oxygen in addition to other elements), I expected nearly all of them to give me the name carbonic acid.

I was mistaken. While many students did indeed identify the compound as carbonic acid, I got many other responses. Here they are.

  1. hydrogen carbonate
  2. hydrogen oxide
  3. hydrocarbonate acid
  4. dihydrogen tricarbonate
  5. hydrocarbonoxide acid
  6. dihydrogen carbonate
  7. dihydrogen tricarbon
  8. dihydromonocarbontrioxic acid
  9. dihydrotricarbonic acid
  10. dihydromonocarbonic acid
  11. hydrogen cardonate
  12. dihydrogen tricarboxide
  13. dihydrogen tricobalt
  14. hydrogencarbonic acid
  15. dihydrogen tricarbonite
  16. hydrocarbonous

Kinda makes your head spin, doesn’t it?

Childhood dreams – The Vectrex

Tuesday, April 11th, 2006

[Vectrex logo]

Some of my favorite arcade games from my chlldhood were Major Havoc and Star Wars. Both of these games featured vector graphics, which meant that the lines and curves drawn by the game on the screen were vivid and sharp, withoiut the blockiness that plagued the graphics of many early arcade games.

Even though the Atari 2600 and Intellivision let us kids play arcade games at home, they couldn’t deliver anything as neat looking as the vector games from the arcade. For that, you had to go to the arcade and put in your quarters. Or, if you were very lucky, you could get your parents to buy you a Vectrex, a system from GCE that brought vector graphics home.

[Vectrex]
My Vectrex

Unlike the other home systems of the time, the Vectrex sported a built-oin monitor and sound system, making it much more like a true arcade system than the Atari or Intellivision offerings. Looking at it, you might even mistake it for a black version of an early Macintosh computer.

[Vectrex from the side]
Side view of the Vectrex

The Vectrex drew curves that didn’t end up looking blocky, as you can see in this screenshot of Pole Position. Diagonal lines were also sharp.

[Pole Position]
A curvy road from the Vectrex version of Pole Position. If you look closely enough, you can also see me with the camera.

Graphics on the Vectrex were bright and vibrant, but only came in one color – white.

[Vectrex Star Trek]
Dead meat in Vectrex Star Trek

I didn’t take a picture of it, but to get color in a vectrex game, you placed a colored overlay on top of the screen, much like some of the early arcde games and handheld games did. The overlays were removable, but I figure a lot of people didn’t bother with the overlays when they played the Vectrex. The overlays dimmed the screen and tended to get scratched in storage.

I saw the Vectrex for the first time in my hometown mall’s toy store in 1983 and immediately wanted one. My parents didn’t pay much attention to that want, probably because the Vectrex was expensive and I already had an Atari 2600. Fair enough, I suppose – but I did get my own Vectrex in 1997, along with a multi-cart that contained all but one of the original Vectrex games. I’ve also managed to scrape together some of the original Vextrex games with boxes, instructions, and overlays. It only took fourteen years from when I first saw the system on display!

Here, almost ten years after that, I still have my Vectrex. As you can see, it still works – despite being over twenty years old! The volume knob is a bit touchy, but the buttons and controls work well, and it’s still fun! I wonder what my children will think of the Vectrex …

Some thoughts on the Sony PSP

Monday, April 10th, 2006

I’m on spring break for the week, so I’m trying to get away from academic things for a few days. On that note, here are some musings about really important stuff – video games!

I picked up a Sony Playstation Portable (PSP) this past December when my wife and I were visiting Las Vegas. It’s quite a neat little machine, sporting a beautiful (and relatively large, for a handheld gaming system) solor screen, built-in stereo speakers, a USB port, wireless connectivity with a built-in web browser, etc. Oh yeah, and it also plays video games. This post will give my impressions of the PSP after having had it for a few months.

General impressions

The PSP seems to be a fairly well-built device. Admittedly, I have not dropped my PSP on the concrete yet or deliberately mistreated it, but it doesn’t break when carried in a jeans pocket, for instance. It can also do a lot of things, as I hinted to above. I think the main problem with the PSP, though, is that it may be a “Jack of all trades”, but like the saying, it is a master of none of them.

Gaming

Ironically, gaming is probably the PSP’s weakest point – unless you have a PSP with revision 2.00 or earlier firmware. If all you have are Sony-provided games, you will probably be looking for something to do with your PSP. There just aren’t many good PSP games out there. I mainly play RPGs / action RPGs / old school games on my main consoles. On the PSP, you have the choice of a few RPGs, but none of them could even remotely be considered must-buy games. PoPoLoCrois, for instance, is a passable – if a bit tedious – RPG experience, but doesn’t do a whole lot that RPGs from the Genesis/SNES era couldn’t do. There’s really nothing on the PSP that could compare to, say, Star Ocean: The Second Story or Grandia on the original Playstation.

The graphics and sound in the games that the PSP has are very nice. Untold Legends: Brotherhood of the Blade, for instance, has very impressive graphics. And truth be told, it’s a pretty good time-waster if you’re on a long trip and not doing the driving yourself. But it’s not really any better (or substantially different) than the host of other hack-and-slash games available on every modern console.

UMD discs are also a bit of a pain. The PSP, unlike every other handheld currently out there, runs its games from a little DVD-like disc called a “UMD”. This presumably makes games a lot cheaper to produce (though you won’t see that reflected in game prices), but adds the twin problems of disc read errors and loading times to handheld gaming. One thing you really don’t expect from a handheld is to have to wait for a game to load. The whole point, in fact, of the handheld is instant gaming. Gaming wherever and whenever you want it, and the PSP misses that boat a little. On the plus side, picking up a game where you left off is almost instantaneous, provided you don’t run out of battery between when you put your PSP to sleep and when you wake it up again. I’ll have to admit that I did experience some glitches here with Untold Legends locking up after trying to continue a game in progress.

The PSP is also equipped with a memory stick duo slot, which makes saving games a breeze and ideally would let you run games from the memory stick so that you don’t have to carry around a pocketful of UMDs. Unfortunately, no Sony-made games appear to support playing from the memory stick. If you want to play games from the memory stick, you’ll have to stick with “homebrew” games and/or emulators and hope your PSP’s firmware is old enough to run them.

The controls of the PSP also leave something to be desired. The D-pad of the PSP is difficult to perform diagonals on, making control in some games imprecise. (I’ve tried several PSPs, and it doesn’t seem to be just mine.) When available, the analog thumbstick works a lot better than the d-pad, but it seemed sluggish on games like Bosconian in the PSP’s Namco classics collection. The other buttons, though, work well enough.

Honestly, if gaming is your only reason to buy a handheld, buy a Nintendo DS or a Gameboy Advance. The game library for either of those systems simply blows away what you’ll find on the PSP. In addition, the systems and games are cheaper.

If you’re an older gamer, though, you might find the form factor of the PSP to be better – with its bigger screen and easier-to-hit controls.

Music

If you’re wondering what to do with sll that memory stick space since Sony doesn’t seem to want to let you stick games on there, you can load the PSP up with MP3 music. The PSP is a passable MP3 player, although if you are expecting a well-thought out interface with lots of features, you will be disappointed. There are almost no features for organizing music. Basically, you just dump tracks onto the PSP (it’s seen by your computer as an external USB drive where you can crag and drop files) and play them.

A plus with using the PSP as a music player is that it has internal speakers. True, they are fairly weak speakers, but you can use the PSP without headphones.

Movies

Another way to use your memory stick space is for movies. True, you can buy movies specifically for the PSP on UMD discs, but why would you want to buy movies for the PSP when they are more expensive than DVDs and not watchable on your television?

That’s right. The PSP has no TV output, so forget watching PSP movies on your television. (Yes, there are a couple of low-quality and expensive options for adding TV-out to the PSP, but why bother?)

More bad news: Sony didn’t make it extremely easy for you to move video to the PSP, since it only supports a very limited range of resolutions and video encoding methods.

The good news is that software makers have come to the rescue. There are packages available for Windows that can convert video to the required PSP format for you without much fuss. Under Linux, the package ffmpeg can convert video from most any other format you have (DVD, for instance) to PSP format. Depending on what quality you want, you can get anywhere from a single movie to 6+ hours of video onto a 1GB memory stick. (If anyone is interested, I could post a “HOWTO” for getting video onto the PSP using a Linux machine.)

This is probably what I use my PSP the most for – a portable movie player. You can carry several movies on the memory stick, so you’ll have something to watch on the go.

Web browsing

With the version 2.00 firmware, Sony has put a usable web browser in the PSP – making it a simple, easily carried web browsing appliance. The browser worke well and supports Javascript, but you won’t be able to access things like streaming video, since the PSP doesn’t support many video formats. Neither Flash nor Java is supported, rendering some sites unusable. On the plus side, the screen is very easy to read on the PSP, and most pages that don’t require Flash or Java are rendered well.

Very large pages won’t fit into the PSP’s memory, triggering the PSP to complain about the size of the page and then display only part of it. Ebay’s search pages do that, as do some other pages with lots og images.

Still, I was able to check e-mail anf surf the web from inside one o the malls in Vegas on the PSP. Neat.

Book reading

Since the PSP functions as a web browser, you mught also expect to be able to read e-books on it. Sony apparently didn’t think of this possibility, but it can be done. You have a few options:

  1. Use a homebrew book reader, which requires you to be running an older version of the PSP firmware.
  2. If the book is in text file format, open it with the web browser. This will only work reliably if the e-book is very short due to the PSP’s memory limitations.
  3. Write a script to convert the e-book to split HTML pages, which you can then read on the PSP without the memory errors. This is what I’ve done. If you want the script (a short python script for Linux – might run on Windows too if you have Python), let me know and I’ll post it.

With the HTML files, you can use the PSP as a passable book reader. Using the large font makes the text very easy to read. It’s too bad Sony didn’t provide some book-reading software with the PSP.

Images

If you have a Sony camera that takes pictures to a memory stick duo, you can use the PSP to view the pictures. Alternatively, you can copy pictures from your computer to the PSP and view them on the PSP. This feature isn’t all that useful to me, but then again I don’t have a Sony camera.

Conclusions

My overall impressions? The PSP is a very cool device. Unfortunately, Sony has gone out of their way to limit the device so that many people won’t really use it for much of anything. The game library is too small, and most other functions of the PSP are limited. If you’re a gadget freak like me, pick one up used. If you want to play games, get a Nintendo handheld instead.

Everything Pregnancy

Sunday, April 9th, 2006

Pregnancy can be rough. The body goes through lots of changes, and there’s a whole lot to learn about. Luckily, there are books available to help! Here is one such book:

[Book cover]

Inside the book, you’ll find (on page 278) some information on labor and delivery, so you’ll know exactly what is going on when the big moment comes! Here’s a part of it:

[Read up on labor and delivery]
[…]
[Complete nonsense]

Helpful, isn’t it?

VSEPR for cats – the CFBCR theory

Friday, April 7th, 2006

One of the first models that beginning students learn to describe the shape of molecules is called VSEPR: Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion theory. The basic idea is that, since pairs of electrons and electrons that are in bonds to other atoms are negatively charged, they will try to push themselves as far apart from each other as possible.

There is evidence for similar behavior among cats, at least when the cats are all bonded to the same bowl of cat food. Here is pictoral evidence for CFBCR: Cat Food Bowl Cat Repulsion theory. Cats, when attracted to the same bowl of cat food, will arrange themselves so that they are as far apart as possible.

[Cats arranged in a T shape]
Ash, Tom, and Rusty illustrate CFBCR theory

A difficult lesson

Tuesday, April 4th, 2006

A California teacher learns a tough lesson.

If you find an old 40mm round in the woods while on a hunting trip, do not slam it down on your desk in an attempt to kill a bug.

Cheaters never prosper, except in Canada?

Tuesday, April 4th, 2006

There’s a snippet of an article from News of the Weird making the rounds in the department today. It’s about a school in Canada that has supposedly forbidden faculty to use online services to check student-submitted papers for plagiarism.

We use one of these services at our school, and I think it’s a pretty good way to make sure students aren’t turning in someone else’s work and claiming it as their own. I personally son’t use the service at the moment, because my intro chemistry and general chemistry students aren’t given term papers to do.

Rather than believe the “News of the Weird” item as it was forwarded to me, I decided to see if I could find out the truth behind the matter. Surely no college would think that forbidding access to a simple tool to help instructors keep students honest would be a good thing to do, right?

Wrong. Here’s an article from CBC News about Mount Saint Vincent University in Nova Scotia, whose administrators have caved in to pressure from some student groups to keep instructors from using plagiarism-detection tools!

The university is banning all plagiarism detection software as of May, when the summer session begins.

Surely, there must be a good reason for this, right?

“Students go to university for a higher education. They don’t go to be involved in a culture of mistrust, a culture of guilt,” said Chantal Brushett, president of the students union.

Sorry, Chantal, but students have been cheating in school ever since the invention of the grade. You say you don’t want a “culture of mistrust”? Well, you’ve just bought yourself one, by admitting here that you do not want your work to be checked to see if it is your own. These programs basically just check to see if you have lifted blocks of text verbatim from other sources without proper attribution, making it a little easier for the instructor to check to see if sources are properly credited and used appropriately.

What puzzles me, though, is this question … why did this college cave in?

Students at several Canadian universities that use the service have objected to the practice, saying an American company is profiting by fostering an atmosphere of distrust at Canadian campuses.

(Emphasis mine) So, anti-Americanism is helping Canadian students cheat? Hey, at least that’s a more creative excuse than the stuff I get.

They also don’t like the fact that their own work becomes part of the database when it is submitted.

I don’t much like that one, myself – but I’m not certain that every bit of anti-plagiarism software on the planet does this.

Brushett acknowledges that some students do cheat, but she fears someone could be accused of plagiarism before the professor even reads that person’s paper.

Only if the paper contains wholesale cut-and-paste copying, Chantal.

Apparently, this tying of instructors’ hands is part of a long-running campaign by the Canadian Federation of Students. The article quoted above links to this 2003 article describing the effort.

The Canadian Federation of Students plans to start a campaign to convince universities to to stop subscribing to the service. It wants schools to use traditional methods of plagiarizing protection, such as submitting first drafts of essays and more detailed bibliographies.

Well, if this student group wants instructors to rely on ancient methods for detecting plagiarism, then perhaps the students would agree to writing their papers with the same technological limitations?

  1. Internet or computer searching for information is not allowed. All references must be photocopied and submitted along with the paper.
  2. All papers must be submitted with one inch margins all around and double-spaced. Papers must be typed on a manual typewriter. Word processing programs or typewriters with word processing features are not permitted.
  3. Charts and graphs must be drawn in black ink on a sheet of graph paper. Computer-printed charts and graphs will not be accepted.
  4. All numerical data will be analyzed manually. In the interests of fostering the use of technology, calculators will be allowed, as long as they do not have spreadsheet functions. The use of spreadsheets for data analysis is forbidden.

Of course, the requirements above are pretty silly. But they’re the student-side equivalent of what these students are asking their instructors to do by lobbying for the prohibition of anti-plagiarism software.

I do have a suggestion for these students who are terrified at the thought that their papers might be run through anti-plagiarism software by their instructors: Stop cutting and pasting stuff off the Internet into your papers! If y’all would stop doing that, we wouldn’t need to pay for anti-plagiarism software!

High school chemistry teacher out of his element

Monday, April 3rd, 2006

Via Pharyngula and Unscrewing the Inscrutable, Meet Tom Ritter, a high school chemistry and physics teacher who seems to be a little out of his element. As a chemistry teacher myself (though at a two-year college), it bothers me to see a colleague become a fountain of stupidity. (I would prefer that chemistry teachers stick with ammonia fountains instead.)

What’s Tom going on abiout? Well, evolution, of course! He doesn’t like it. He and the Constitution Party of Pennsylvania want to have a debate, because he doesn’t think that evolution is “true science”.

It’s more likely that the (fringe) Constitution Party merely wants some publicity in the local newspapers, but that’s another issue. It might also be possible that this whole article is close enough to April 1st to be a parody, but I’ll pretend for the moment that Tom and the Constitution Party are serious.

Here are Tom’s problems with evolution:

  1. No one has demonstrated that life can evolve where none existed before.
  2. No one has demonstrated that a new sexual species can evolve.
  3. Evolution theorizes the human brain evolved from lower forms of life. Over 50 years into the age of computers, we can build machines that can crunch numbers far better and faster than humans, recognize and use language and tools, and beat us in chess. Yet science has yet to build even a rudimentary computer than can contemplate its own existence, the hallmark of the human brain.
  1. Evolution, as most people who have ready anything at all on the subject would know, describes what happens after we have something resembling life – i.e. things that can reproduce and pass on characteristics to their offspring. Tom’s problem seems to be abiogenesis, which no scientist is going to argue has been completely worked out.
  2. This one I’ll leave to a biologist, but I’d recommend a search for speciation on PubMed. Is Tom’s argument the new creationist version of “No new species have been observed”? Gotta love those moving creationist goalposts.
  3. So we don’t understand all the details about how the brain works. So what? In what way is that a failure of evolutionary theory? I’ll bet that Tom can’t tabulate for me either manually or with his chess-playing computer the momentum and position of every electron in all the atoms of a gallon of gasoline. Does that mean that he cannot possibly tell me how an internal combustion engine works?
  4. With every one of these criticisms, Tom seems to be telling us that since biologists don’t know everything, they can’t know anything. That’s a dangerous position to take if you’re a chemistry or physics teacher. Does this guy teach atomic theory? Valence bond and molecular orbital theory? Kinetic theory of gases? Classical mechanics? The gas laws?

    Further on down, Tom says something else that’s not really related to science, but is pretty silly anyway.

    God with an upper case G is the Being recognized by Christians, Muslims, Jews and many others to possess remarkably similar traits, among them the ability to create.

    Tom, you just try to tell some of these folks that they worship the same “Being” as the Christian God. I don’t think they would buy it.

    Evolution may be right, at least in parts. But it is not treated as science and materialism is a faulty theory to rely upon.

    Tom, in a footnote, defines materialism as “the theory that everything can be explained by things that can be detected and measured”.

    Tom, do you know that’s how science works – by investigating things that have effects that can be tested and measured? Do you know that evolutionary theory is based on things that can be tested and measured, just like all the other scientific theories? If you don’t know this, then how the heck can you manage to teach science in the first place? Or do you just reject the science if it tells you something that you are unprepared to hear?

They’re taking over our minds!

Sunday, April 2nd, 2006

While doing a little research on South Carolina education, I came across a group called SC PIE, a “a grassroots organization committed to excellence in the public schools of South Carolina through the meaningful involvement of parents in children’s education”.

Their website suggests that they’re mainly a group interested in two things – putting religion in the science classroom and giving tax money to private schools. But this is the wtong blog for serious discussion of issues. You came here for funny stuff!

You can access this group’s newsletters online, as PDF documents. Here’s a sample, from December 2004.

[PIE Logo]

[Mind seige]

Looks to me like the writer’s mind was decimated before she finished the headline!